everything wrong with free software

 "obedience breeds foolishness"

### [generate-title] other pages: => why-bsd | => letters-to-a-computer-student *originally posted:* jan 2021 *updated:* aug 2021 praise is nice; its nice to feel appreciated. some people place too much importance on it and compromise too much while chasing after it. other people use flattery to nudge people towards doing things they want of them. when someone is downplaying or minimising your contributions however, its nice to go back and notice that you werent just talking to yourself for two years. besides, if you are advocating change it is helpful to have some indication that some messages got across. the 90-9-1 rule applies as well. => https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%25_rule_(Internet_culture) Very nice article as usual. I’m a Crux user and from start I freaked that contains non-libre ports. I start cloning official git repositories and added linux libre port. I noticed dependency in github because I blocked amazon on ip level and noticed I could not download majority of sources. http://techrights.org/2020/05/03/gnuhub-pt-1/#comments *_I3^RELATIVISM cheer to the author Jan 23* 23:27 _I3^RELATIVISM *[lit]http://techrights.org/2020/08/21/last-article/[lit]* Jan 23 23:27 -TechrightsBot-tr[lit]/[lit]#techrights-techrights.org | *So It’s Come to This? | Techrights* Jan 23 23:27 _I3^RELATIVISM *great article* Jan 23 23:27 http://techrights.org/irc-archives/irc-log-techrights-230121.html *vZS1 Lack of computing literacy is also an issue Dec 17* 08:11 vZS1 *Because people that have computing literacy are less likely to be duped* Dec 17 08:11 vZS1 *Fig's article touching on computing literacy hit the nail on the head* Dec 17 08:12 vZS1 People learning about computing only learn what GIAFAM want. It's designed to dumb people down, reduce competition, and market their ecosystems Dec 17 08:14 http://techrights.org/irc-archives/irc-log-techrights-171220.html this one was most likely a direct comment; its not always certain whether hes quoting or not. schestowitz *VERY powerful article*. Mar 14 09:54 schestowitz *Well done and thank you!* Mar 14 09:54 http://techrights.org/irc-archives/irc-log-techbytes-140320.html schestowitz *Just opened my mail client again to tell fig how much I enjoyed his latest article*. Nov 14 12:32 schestowitz Tom, your latest article was opened by a human (non-bot) over 4,000 times so far. Nov 14 12:32 http://techrights.org/irc-archives/irc-log-techbytes-141120.html schestowitz >> The Real Richard Stallman is Not Coming Back Nov 17 07:15 schestowitz > *Another excellent piece!* Nov 17 07:15 http://techrights.org/irc-archives/irc-log-171120.html mixed praise from a tech journalist that ive (along with roy) criticised for lack of integrity in the past: acer-box *Kind of an interesting read. Chapter 10 of 10 posted so far. More chapters to come, I think*. Beware, it's Techrights, so it could go ga-ga at any time. Maybe already has. I've only read this chapter, so I don't know: The Computer Anybody Can Edit Aug 09 23:17 http://techrights.org/irc-archives/irc-log-techbytes-090820.html => https://wrongwithfreesw.neocities.org